Twitter: woodstockinst Facebook: 305087839971 YouTube: woodstockinst Google Plus 2: woodstockinstitute Flickr: 48923005@N07 FeedBurner: woodstockinst
Tracking Loan Modifications: August 2009
Written by Katie Buitrago   
Friday, 18 September 2009 12:51
The Department of the Treasury recently released its second report card on how mortgage lenders are doing modifying loans for eligible homeowners under the government’s Making Home Affordable program (see the first report card).

Sixteen lenders, as well as 2,300 participants with Fannie Mae- and Freddie Mac-insured loans, started modifications for less than the national average of 12% of eligible loans, while only eight lenders modified more than 12% of their eligible loans. Last month, thirteen lenders modified fewer loans than the national average, while seven lenders modified more loans than the national average.
Here at Woodstock Institute, we’re tracking the mortgage lenders active in the Chicago area to see how they’re performing on their commitment to reducing monthly payments for distressed homeowners. Check back here every month to see who’s getting better—or worse.
090918_tracking_loan_mods_2_small.jpg
090918_tracking_loan_mods_small.jpg


add comment Comments (2)

K Buitrago said:

...
Hi Mike-- those are interesting points, but not entirely applicable to the types of modifications happening under the Making Home Affordable program. Many of the modifications made prior to HAMP ended up keeping monthly payments the same or actually raising them. HAMP modifications, however, place a special emphasis on affordability and keeping monthly payments under 31% of the borrower's income. This means that borrowers will be less likely to re-default. For more on that, see here: http://www.woodstockinst.org/b...rger-point—and-some-evidence,-too/
September 23, 2009

Mike Baker said:

...
One would think that if modifying a mortgage is less costly that foreclosure then it would benefit both parties (Mortgage holder & Borrower) to engage in this process. The problem is that more than half of these renegoiations fail, with the loan going back into default. In a rising housing market that wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing, but in a decreasing housing market foreclosing on a property later often results in the mortgage holder taking a bigger loss.

Another factor is that often times the reasons causing the need to renegotiate cure themselves within 18 months or less. Thus, a mortgage holder that renegotiates for a lower interest rate are losing money unnecessarily.
September 23, 2009

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 
Discussion topics

access to banking services affordable housing asset limit reform bankruptcy building savings CDFIs CFPA consumer loan reform CRA credit cards credit scores credit unions data stories debt settlement EITC federal reg reform foreclosures from the president global Guest post HAMP analyses HMDA Illinois Community Investment Coalition loan modifications mortgage lending online community lending fact book overdraft loans photo policy press release RALs reading list Regional HOPI retirement security small business vacant properties video wealth building wh

Latest Comments
Homeowners receiving Illinois Hardest Hi...
I received a Loan Modification from my lender, probably due to filing with Illinois Hardest Hit. I am attempting to see how well others have faired. ...
Data underscore need for principal reduc...
1. Servicers, not investors, make the decisions to modify, foreclose, or not, with little regulation, oversite, or accountability. 2. Servicers get ...
Receive email updates






A member of:
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
29 E. Madison, Suite 1710 | Chicago, Illinois 60602-4566 | (312) 368-0310 tel | (312) 368-0316 fax
| Careers | Privacy | Site Map | Distribution/Linking Policy | Calendar of Events | Donate | Browse all documents |