Twitter: woodstockinst Facebook: 305087839971 YouTube: woodstockinst Google Plus 2: woodstockinstitute Flickr: 48923005@N07 FeedBurner: woodstockinst
Illinois Hardest Hit Fund aims to assist 15,000 unemployed homeowners
Written by Katie Buitrago   
Friday, 14 October 2011 14:49

Solutions to the foreclosure crisis have been notoriously difficult to pin down, in part because the forces that drive foreclosure are diverse and changing. Some borrowers are under duress because their monthly payments have grown substantially. Others owe more on their homes than they are worth or have lost their incomes due to unemployment. Each situation requires different types of interventions to effectively prevent foreclosure whenever possible. The majority of government interventions thus far have focused on helping homeowners whose payments have become unaffordable. The Illinois Housing Development Authority (IHDA) recently launched a $445.6 million program that’s designed to help the third group—people struggling with their mortgage payments due to a significant loss of income.

The Hardest Hit Fund, funded by the U.S. Department of Treasury, offers struggling homeowners a 10-year forgivable loan for up to $25,000 to bring their mortgages current by paying arrearages, penalties, and fines, as well as regular monthly mortgage payments. Programs like the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), which focus on making monthly payments more affordable, aren’t tailored to the needs of borrowers who have experienced a dramatic drop in income and cannot afford to make even reduced monthly payments. With unemployment rates reaching nearly 10 percent in Illinois, a program like HHF is badly needed to help keep families in their homes while they look for work. Community interest has been substantial—IHDA has already received more than 15,000 applications, mostly from the Chicago area. The program is projected to help 15,000 homeowners stay in their homes.

 

“If we can keep people in their homes, we have a better chance of keeping neighborhoods stable,” says Ronald Litke, Director of Communications at IHDA.

 

In order to use HHF funds effectively, IHDA developed a set of eligibility requirements to target “people who seem like they have a good chance of getting back on their feet,” according to Litke. Homeowners must have experienced an income reduction of 25 percent or more due to un- or under-employment through no fault of their own. Homeowners’ incomes must be at or below 120 percent of area median income, and the principal loan balance of the mortgage cannot be more than $500,000. Only homeowners with fixed- or adjustable-rate mortgages are eligible for the program—interest-only or negatively amortizing loans would not be eligible, for example. Homeowners can apply for the program for free and learn about all eligibility requirements at the Hardest Hit Fund’s website. Ineligible homeowners who apply for the program will work with counselors to seek out other options and can appeal the decision.

 

 

Read more at RegionalHOPI.org

add comment Comments (1)

Marc Kovitz said:

...
IS THE ILLINOIS HARDEST HIT PROGRAM FAIR TO HOMEOWNERS IN FINANCIAL TROUBLE ….

Can a struggling homeowner trying to save their home really afford to reimburse the Illinois Hardest Hit Program (IHDA) 31% of their Existing Gross Monthly Household Income (which is probably closer to 40% of their NET SPENDABLE INCOME)? Can a struggling homeowner sustain that monthly contribution payment to IHDA during their enrollment in the program? 31% represents the Front-End Housing Ratio Rule the Treasury Dept. uses for the Hardest Hit Program in each State, a program supposedly intended for financially struggling homeowners (the Treasury Departments Making Home Affordable HAMP program also uses a 31% Rule)? The 31% Rule ... is pure insanity and places a real strain on the homeowner’s ability to pay all their monthly bills and still set aside money for emergency savings.

Ever since the "Excesses" in the mortgage industry that came to a screeching halt in 2008 when our economy went into a tailspin, the mortgage industry has quietly lowered the 31% Front-End House Ratio for the average homeowner (but, still bases it on Gross Income). Of course, higher housing ratios still exist for those homeowners flush with money to spend. To date, the FHA has lowered the Housing Ratio to “29%”, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac now recommends less than “28%” for loans they invest in, and conventional mortgage lenders now average “28%”. But not the Department of the Treasury that set up the rules, they won’t budge from 31% + of a homeowners Gross Monthly Household Income.
Back in the 70's and 80's the Front-End Housing Ratio hovered between 22% and 25% of a person’s "NET" INCOME. Guess what, with a more rational approach to housing costs, less people ran into mortgage problems because their mortgage payment didn't take such a big chunk out of their “NET” spendable income. When times got difficult, homeowners could still pay the mortgage without struggling, but not true these days! How do you budget and pay your monthly bills? Do you use a Gross Income calculation or do you use a NET INCOME calculation? Most people (probably everyone in America) budget and pay bills from the NET INCOME (but not the Department of Treasury, they are immovable in their thinking).

BOTTOM LINE, homeowners having financial problems are still being placed in jeopardy through the application of archaic government rules. Struggling homeowners are being expected to use 31% + of their GROSS INCOME toward a mortgage payment when the industry has wisely reduced that obligation to 28% or less. Something is really wrong with this Treasury Rule! Our Department of Treasury (along with the Hardest Hit Program in each State) needs to be realistic when it comes to housing expenses. Let’s return to those sensible days when housing costs were less than a quarter of a person’s NET INCOME.

[NOTE .. Hope that you are not on Social Security Disability or Social Security Retirement if you also reach out for Federal HAMP assistance. If you are, besides the 31% Rule, Treasury will add 25% more to your Social Security Award Amount and then claim you have all this extra “funny money” which you can’t even; spend, invest, stuff under the mattress, etc. (they call it; “Income Grossing Up”) to budget and pay your monthly bills to include any HAMP mortgage modification payment].
March 24, 2012

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 
Discussion topics

access to banking services affordable housing asset limit reform bankruptcy building savings CDFIs CFPA consumer loan reform CRA credit cards credit scores credit unions data stories debt settlement EITC federal reg reform foreclosures from the president global Guest post HAMP analyses HMDA Illinois Community Investment Coalition loan modifications mortgage lending online community lending fact book overdraft loans photo policy press release RALs reading list Regional HOPI retirement security small business vacant properties video wealth building wh

Latest Comments
Homeowners receiving Illinois Hardest Hi...
I received a Loan Modification from my lender, probably due to filing with Illinois Hardest Hit. I am attempting to see how well others have faired. ...
Data underscore need for principal reduc...
1. Servicers, not investors, make the decisions to modify, foreclose, or not, with little regulation, oversite, or accountability. 2. Servicers get ...
Receive email updates






A member of:
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
29 E. Madison, Suite 1710 | Chicago, Illinois 60602-4566 | (312) 368-0310 tel | (312) 368-0316 fax
| Careers | Privacy | Site Map | Distribution/Linking Policy | Calendar of Events | Donate | Browse all documents |