Twitter: woodstockinst Facebook: 305087839971 YouTube: woodstockinst Google Plus 2: woodstockinstitute Flickr: 48923005@N07 FeedBurner: woodstockinst
From the President: Ocwen proves principal reduction works; FHFA still refuses to budge
Written by Dory Rand   
Thursday, 15 December 2011 00:00

Ocwen, one of the leading mortgage servicers, has had success in doing principal write-downs on home mortgages so that families can stay in their homes, reported Ocwen’s Paul Koches at the annual Home Ownership Preservation Initiative conference on December 9. Using a proprietary underwriting system developed by Ocwen, the servicer has been able to modify mortgages in such a way as to reduce the principal amount owed, which helps many homeowners who currently owe more than their home is worth.  For Ocwen loans where principal reductions have been approved, the company claims that only 3 percent of borrowers re-default.

 

 

Unfortunately, mortgages held by the government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (GSEs) are not eligible for principal reduction under the policies of Edward DeMarco, acting director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), the  regulator and conservator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  Since, in many cases, modification with principal reduction could result in a less costly outcome than foreclosure, principal reduction is one tool that could reduce the impact on taxpayers and produce higher returns to investors.  DeMarco's refusal to consider principal reduction is troubling, especially when the GSEs buy more than 70 percent of all mortgages sold.

 

While refusing to protect taxpayers and investors by allowing principal reduction, the FHFA is suing the City of Chicago to halt enforcement of a new ordinance that holds servicers accountable for maintaining vacant properties in foreclosure.  Woodstock's research documented the almost 1,900 vacant properties in Chicago that servicers likely walked away from after filing foreclosure actions. The ordinance requires servicers to register and maintain properties that otherwise blight neighborhoods and impose significant costs on the City.

 

We hope that Mr. DeMarco will rethink his positions or make room for a new director to act in the interests of homeowners, communities, taxpayers and investors.

 

add comment Comments (5)

Chuck Yeager said:

...
I believe Shelia Bair suggest a plan like this years ago. I wonder if the “qualified loans” go through re-underwriting checks of income, assets, credit, and title to assist in improving the success rate. Do you know the amount and percentage that have qualified compared to those that appeared to be candidates or that applied? Did Ocwen provide a detailed pdf on there process? Borrowers that have a second mortgage with a different lender would likely not qualify.

“Through the program, Ocwen will write down qualified loans to 95% of the underlying property's market value. The amount written down is forgiven in one-third increments over three years as long as the homeowner remains current. When the house is later sold or refinanced, the borrower will be required to share 25% of the appreciated value with the investor.” (Prior, July 2011) http://www.housingwire.com/201...on-program

I like the potential behind this modification program; I hope it has better success than HAMP.
December 20, 2011

Harold Barnett said:

...
The Wall Street Journal recently had a long piece on Ocwen and its strategy (Ruth Simon, Thinking Deeply on Risky Lender, Dec. 12, 2011). Ocwen has purchased Litton, Saxon and HomeEq Servicing and is now the largest subprime servicer. Their strategy includes employing a team of 16 psychologists who craft scripts for call center employess and, as Katie noted, doing shared appreciation mortgages. One of the oft stated reasons why servicers prefer to foreclose rathen than modify is so they can get back their fees and advances. Ocwen appears to be attempting to achieve the same result (for some borrowers) by getting delinquent borrowers back on track.
December 15, 2011

Katie Buirtago said:

...
Thanks for the comments, Harold and Chuck.

Paul Koches said that Ocwen considers all underwater homeowners who are delinquent for their principal reduction modification program, which is called the Shared Appreciation Modification. As the name indicates, the investors in the loan will share in the appreciation of the home value if and when home values rise. Currently, Ocwen does not offer SAMs to underwater homeowners who are not delinquent unless the homeowner can prove that they are in danger of falling behind on their loans.

We agree that principal reduction will not be appropriate for all loans, but given the high prevalence of underwater loans and their likelihood to default, servicers should have the option to use principal reduction when it makes sense for the borrower and for the investor. The FHFA has a blanket policy against principal reductions, which does not allow for that flexibility even if a principal reduction would benefit investors. There is a significant body of research showing that principal reductions have lower re-default rates than other types of modifications--you can read more about that here: http://www.woodstockinst.org/b...-or-not?-/
December 15, 2011

Chuck Yeager said:

...
Interesting article; I want to know all the parameters in which made the modification process a success. For example, the small niche of the qualified borrowers for this principal reduction may not relate to the average mortgage that is seriously delinquent. There are several different steps that could reduce foreclosures; however, the key is to find away for it to be cost effective for the bank to perform the modification. There are several research journals that illustrate that it is not cost effect to modify (or to significantly modify) the loan.

Unfortunately, some aspects of the FHFA has too strong of a reach in which municipalities can not enforce potentially effective measure to reduce foreclosures. As for the title, it would be more accurate to have an asterisk by "Proves" and then proceed to have at least a page of limitations from their research included.
December 15, 2011

Harold Barnett said:

...
Did Ocwen reveal what factors it considered in allowing a principal reduction vs. other options? Strategic default is the rallying cry of those who oppose this alternative. Perhaps Ocwen simply talkes seriously the fact that foreclosure will most likely impose a greater loss in value than a succesful modification.
December 15, 2011

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 
Discussion topics

access to banking services affordable housing asset limit reform bankruptcy building savings CDFIs CFPA consumer loan reform CRA credit cards credit scores credit unions data stories debt settlement EITC federal reg reform foreclosures from the president global Guest post HAMP analyses HMDA Illinois Community Investment Coalition loan modifications mortgage lending online community lending fact book overdraft loans photo policy press release RALs reading list Regional HOPI retirement security small business vacant properties video wealth building wh

Latest Comments
Homeowners receiving Illinois Hardest Hi...
I received a Loan Modification from my lender, probably due to filing with Illinois Hardest Hit. I am attempting to see how well others have faired. ...
Data underscore need for principal reduc...
1. Servicers, not investors, make the decisions to modify, foreclose, or not, with little regulation, oversite, or accountability. 2. Servicers get ...
Receive email updates






A member of:
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
29 E. Madison, Suite 1710 | Chicago, Illinois 60602-4566 | (312) 368-0310 tel | (312) 368-0316 fax
| Careers | Privacy | Site Map | Distribution/Linking Policy | Calendar of Events | Donate | Browse all documents |