Learn More About Woodstock
 
From the President: What we need is a meaningful, national standard for mortgage underwriting Print E-mail

The recently exposed problems in the subprime lending segment of the mortgage market should come as no surprise.  Too many lenders offered too many loans with payments that seemed affordable during a brief introductory period, but skyrocketed shortly thereafter--leaving borrowers in foreclosure and communities devastated.

In many respects, the widespread availability of mortgage credit has had a positive effect on communities throughout the country.  Home ownership rates are at a record high and families that, in a previous era, would have been lifelong renters are living comfortably and building equity in their own homes.

But inadequate, and in many cases, nonexistent underwriting standards continue to spoil the dream for some and damage the property values of many. There is a strong connection between the growth and concentration of subprime lending and increases in foreclosures--not just in recent weeks, but in recent years.   

It seems reasonable to hold lenders accountable to basic standards that make sure borrowers are getting loans they can truly afford.  While this seems simple, our experience with predatory mortgage reform at the state and federal levels has been anything but simple. Previous laws failed to prevent the problems we are now seeing for a very straightforward reason. The nature of predatory lending is such that any attempt to regulate specific products or practices simply serves as an impetus for unscrupulous lenders to develop new methods for preying on vulnerable home owners.

What we need is a national standard--which is clear to both borrowers and lenders--to ensure that loans fit the borrower's short and long term financial situation.  First, loans should be underwritten to ensure that potential home owners can afford the loan throughout its entire term, not just the introductory period.  Second, when a loan is refinanced, there should be some clearly defined, long term benefit to the home owner.  But standards must be enforced.  The federal Home Ownership Equity Protection Act provides that the Federal Reserve Board “shall prohibit” unfair and deceptive practices has simply not been applied with any vigor or effectiveness.

Reforms based on these standards and a new sense of urgency and responsibility on the part of federal regulators can restore confidence in the subprime industry while making sustainable home ownership a possibility for millions of Americans.




Bookmark with:
Digg!Del.icio.us!Google!Facebook!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Furl!Yahoo!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Comments (1)add comment

DuWarn V. Porter said:

  I recently was laid off from a Sub-prime servicing company in Downers Grove, IL. My staff and I was responsible for the quality assurance audits of sub-prime loans prior to purchasing the servicing rights to the portfolios. About 5 years ago we started reporting to our lenders the problems with underwriting and funding of sub-prime loans. Primarily centered around debt ratio. The lenders were actually qualifying the borrower not using the full amortized payment. Not suprisingly most of the lenders ignored the problem and my company ignored the problem to because we eventually bought serveral portfolios from these subprime lenders. I agree with you that there needs to be a national standard. But there also needs to be not only fine for companies that fail to lend according to that standard. Fortunaltey or Unfortunaletly the market corrected itself with all these lenders closing because of non-performing loans but homeownership will suffer in poorer communities because sub-prime lenders are the only lender that make below market loans. So eliminating these companies just make homeownership for minorities and poor people that much harder. The legislation need to be in regulating all lenders to practice fair lending policy for everyone.
August 20, 2007

Write comment

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
< Prev   Next >
Popular of Late

Thirty-Five Percent of Mortgages in Foreclosure in 2007 Were Originated Just One Year Earlier

Latest Comments
Thirty-Five Percent of Mortgages in Fore...
Considering the devestating effect that foreclosures have on neighborhood property values, there are strategies that can be employed to Stop Foreclosu...
Thirty-Five Percent of Mortgages in Fore...
Would you have this type of information for Arizona. I am doing research on foreclosures and I would like to know where else I can obtain this type ...
View Articles by Month

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

July, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

Press Releases
feed image
Syndicate Blog
feed image
29 E. Madison, Suite 1710 | Chicago, Illinois 60602-4566 | (312) 368-0310 tel | (312) 368-0316 fax
| Career Opportunities | Links | Site Requirements | Privacy | Site Map |