Twitter: woodstockinst Facebook: 305087839971 YouTube: woodstockinst Google Plus 2: woodstockinstitute Flickr: 48923005@N07 FeedBurner: woodstockinst
Federal Housing Finance Agency seeks to block maintenance requirements for Chicago vacant properties stuck in foreclosure process
Written by Tom Feltner   
Tuesday, 13 December 2011 18:31

The Federal Housing Finance Agency, the agency charged with overseeing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, has filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against the city of Chicago to prevent enforcement of Chicago’s vacant property ordinance.  The agency states that the City’s effort to hold mortgagees responsible for the upkeep of troubled, vacant properties stuck in the foreclosure process infringes on the FHFA’s sole authority to supervise the secondary mortgage market enterprises.

 

“With the foreclosure process taking longer to complete, it is critical to hold mortgagees accountable for vacant properties stuck in the foreclosure process,” said Tom Feltner, vice president of Woodstock Institute.  “Ensuring that these vacant properties are safe and secure preserves the value of the home and protects both the lender and neighboring homeowners from the problems associated with foreclosure-related vacancy.”

 

The ordinance was recently revised to reflect many of the changes that Chicago region mortgage servicers believed were necessary to move forward with the enforcement of the ordinance.

 

In the recent report entitled, Left Behind: Troubled Foreclosed Properties and Servicer Accountability in Chicago, Woodstock identified nearly 1,900 vacant properties in some stage of foreclosure in Chicago alone.   In cases where responsibility for the stewardship of the property is unclear, this status suggests a lack of effective ownership, oversight, and accountability for the maintenance and security of these properties.   Woodstock also identified the significant burden these types of properties place on municipalities and estimated that the costs of dealing with these properties in building court, securing the properties, responding to criminal activity, and potentially demolishing these properties was approximately $36 million.

 

add comment Comments (0)

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 
Discussion topics

access to banking services affordable housing asset limit reform bankruptcy building savings CDFIs CFPA consumer loan reform CRA credit cards credit scores credit unions data stories debt settlement EITC federal reg reform foreclosures from the president global Guest post HAMP analyses HMDA Illinois Community Investment Coalition loan modifications mortgage lending online community lending fact book overdraft loans photo policy press release RALs reading list Regional HOPI retirement security small business vacant properties video wealth building wh

Latest Comments
Homeowners receiving Illinois Hardest Hi...
I received a Loan Modification from my lender, probably due to filing with Illinois Hardest Hit. I am attempting to see how well others have faired. ...
Data underscore need for principal reduc...
1. Servicers, not investors, make the decisions to modify, foreclose, or not, with little regulation, oversite, or accountability. 2. Servicers get ...
Receive email updates






A member of:
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
29 E. Madison, Suite 1710 | Chicago, Illinois 60602-4566 | (312) 368-0310 tel | (312) 368-0316 fax
| Careers | Privacy | Site Map | Distribution/Linking Policy | Calendar of Events | Donate | Browse all documents |