Twitter: woodstockinst Facebook: 305087839971 YouTube: woodstockinst Google Plus 2: woodstockinstitute Flickr: 48923005@N07 FeedBurner: woodstockinst
Fed puts an end to retroactive rate hikes for credit cards
December 18, 2008
The Federal Reserve is set to take unprecedented measures to protect consumers from the credit card industry’s worst practices, such as interest rate hikes on existing balances. The final rule, expected to pass today, is the culmination of over two years of debate on how to best protect consumers from the arbitrary interest rate hikes and high fees that have come to characterize the $970 billion industry.
Perhaps most importantly, the Fed will forbid lenders from raising the interest on past balances, a practice that has drawn sharp criticism from borrowers and consumer advocates who claim this practice makes it impossible to compare the long term cost of consumer credit. 
Woodstock Institute, a longtime critic of unilateral changes to credit card agreements, first illustrated the practice in 2005 with an analysis of the terms and conditions of credit cards offered by major banks, and those cards issued by credit unions.  The report found that credit unions were much clearer about the total cost of borrowing. While these rules take important steps toward eliminating many of the credit card industry’s worst practices, they are no substitute for Congressional action to protect consumers.
“A rule is a rule, and can be rolled back down the road,” says Tom Feltner, policy and communication director at Woodstock Institute. “We applaud the Fed’s strong position in favor of the consumer, but look to Congress to enshrine these protections into law.”
The Credit Cardholder’s Bill of Rights, introduced by Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) in 2008, included many of the provisions included in today’s Fed rule.  It passed the House Financial Services Committee with the support of Illinois Reps. Luis Gutierrez and Melissa Bean and is expected to be a top priority in the coming session.

 

add comment Comments (1)

Linda Ingram said:

...
In my personal effort to get out of debt, I consolidated with Chase BP Visa, a card I have had for fifteen years. They offered 3,99% until the debt is paid off $8000. I paid the 3% fee to do this knowing my payments would be about $160 a month although I was paying $200 and was going to increase that amount to pay it off in 3 years. I suddenly discovered that my minimum payment is now 5% of the balance which is $400 and $10 "fee". This is abuse of the terms. They offered to reduce the payment to $200 but increase the interest to 7.98%. What about the 3% fee I paid for the lower interest rate. This is skirting the new protections and must be addressed!
Thanks for your work!
February 02, 2009

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 
Discussion topics

access to banking services affordable housing asset limit reform bankruptcy building savings CDFIs CFPA consumer loan reform CRA credit cards credit scores credit unions data stories debt settlement EITC federal reg reform foreclosures from the president global Guest post HAMP analyses HMDA Illinois Community Investment Coalition loan modifications mortgage lending online community lending fact book overdraft loans photo policy press release RALs reading list Regional HOPI retirement security small business vacant properties video wealth building wh

Latest Comments
From the President: Ocwen proves princip...
The Wall Street Journal recently had a long piece on Ocwen and its strategy (Ruth Simon, Thinking Deeply on Risky Lender, Dec. 12, 2011). Ocwen has pu...
From the President: Ocwen proves princip...
Thanks for the comments, Harold and Chuck. Paul Koches said that Ocwen considers all underwater homeowners who are delinquent for their principal red...
Receive email updates






A member of:
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
29 E. Madison, Suite 1710 | Chicago, Illinois 60602-4566 | (312) 368-0310 tel | (312) 368-0316 fax
| Careers | Privacy | Site Map | Distribution/Linking Policy | Calendar of Events | Donate | Browse all documents |