Twitter: woodstockinst Facebook: 305087839971 YouTube: woodstockinst Google Plus 2: woodstockinstitute Flickr: 48923005@N07 FeedBurner: woodstockinst
Completed foreclosures in Cook County rise from end of 2010, says new analysis
Written by Sarah Duda and Katie Buitrago   
Wednesday, 27 April 2011 00:00

Banks repossess nearly 2,800 homes in Cook County in the first quarter of 2011

Completed foreclosure auctions in Cook County increased substantially from the final quarter of 2010 to the first quarter of 2011, adding thousands of properties to the County’s vacant property inventory, say new data released today by Woodstock Institute. The 10.5 percent increase in completed foreclosures from the fourth quarter of 2010 to the first quarter of 2011 was likely caused by a resumption of foreclosure activity after the end-of-year pause in many servicers’ foreclosure processes due to the robo-signing scandal.

 

The analysis also found:

In the first quarter of 2011, Cook County experienced a 7.2 percent increase in foreclosure filings compared to the first quarter of 2010.

Increases were observed in all areas of Suburban Cook, ranging from the biggest increase in North Cook County (18.2 percent) to the smallest increase in Northwest Cook County (10.4 percent).

Newly filed foreclosures increased slightly in the City of Chicago, where foreclosure filing activity increased just one percent in the first quarter of 2011 over the same period in 2010.  In City of Chicago community areas, large increases were observed in East Side (108.7), Archer Heights (76.2), Lakeview (60.3) and North Center (57.9).  Significant decreases were observed in Washington Heights (25.6), Auburn Gresham (29), Irving Park (21.2), and Rogers Park (20.2).

A significant decline in completed foreclosure auctions was observed in the first quarter of 2011 in Cook County when comparing data to the same period in 2010.

In many areas of Cook County, more properties completed foreclosure in the first quarter of 2011 than in the fourth quarter of 2010, when the flow of data was significantly impacted by the near industry-wide rescheduling-and-review of foreclosure cases prompted by the robo-signing scandal.

In Cook County, 54.3 percent fewer properties completed the auction process in the first quarter of 2011 than in the first quarter of 2010.

Significant year-over-year declines were observed in all sub-areas of Cook County and in nearly every Chicago community area.

Comparing the first quarter of 2011 to the fourth quarter of 2010, completed auctions increased by 10.5 percent in Cook County.  In Suburban Cook, increases ranged from 20.3 percent in Southwest Cook County to 10.9 percent in North Cook County.  Slight decreases were observed in Northwest Cook County (1.9) and South Cook County (0.3).  In the City of Chicago, completed auctions increased by 14.4 percent between the fourth quarter of 2010 and the first quarter of 2011.

It is likely that a steady increase in auctions quarter to quarter will continue to be observed in 2011 as the bottleneck created by the robo-signing scandal is resolved. In Cook County in the first quarter of 2011, as has been true throughout the crisis, the vast majority of properties were not purchased at auction and instead reverted to the lender as Real Estate Owned (REO).  It is likely that many of these REO properties are now vacant.


(Click for larger chart)

----------

How do vacant properties impact neighborhoods?

Vacant properties put substantial strain on community resources by potentially lowering property values and attracting destabilizing elements. For more information on the impact of vacant homes, see our latest report (press release) .

 

add comment Comments (2)

john Ahern said:

...
Doesnt it appear that we are letting the federal policies along with bank preference for foreclosure and resale to hollow out the poorer minority areas; and that this will expand beyond Cook County.
Look at the next level, where the FDIC has Consent Orders on many many community baniks; the incentives to takeover by "acquirers" must be stopped now in order to defer a huge third wave of foreclosures. It appears the "acquiring" lender upon acquisition takes--for no or little cash--the loans of the detroyed bank and proceed to destroy the CUSTOMERS of the destroyed bank; no workouts, no writedowns seem generally happending: If the $1 million house.strip mall,,etc is now worth $300,000 the "acquirer" can sell it for $200,000 THEN gets cash "loss sharing" from FDIC of 80% of "loss" normally up to old principal balance of loan; some have accrued higher amounts; so at least for a $300000 thing in this example the new bank gets say $200000 PLUS 80% of "loss" of $800,000 or ANOTHER OR $560,000. IF YOU CANT CHANGE THE LAW (BANKS ARE SPENDING $100 MILLION A MONTH TO MAKE SURE YOU CANT) THEN SLOW IT DOWN BY (1) CHANGING INCENTIVE TO SAY 50%, AND/OR DELAYING FED PAYMENT FOR SAY 5 YEARS. HAVE SEN DURBIN INTRODUCE THAT (HE WONT) OR GET A BLACK CAUCUS MEMBER TO INTRODUCE SOMETHING THAT ACCOMPLISHES SUCH, AND AT LEAST YOU WILL HAVE A VIGOROUS DISCUSSION. OR YOU COULD PROPOSE THAT ANY BANK WITH MORE THAN $50 MILLION IN CREDIT SWAPS DERIVATIVES NOT TIED TO INTEREST RATES LOSE ITS FDIC INSURANCE; THESE LARGE INSTITUTIONS SHOULD NO LONGER BE BANKS.THANKS.
May 02, 2011

Charles Yeager said:

...
Thank you for your update on area foreclosures. The robo-signing scandal contributed to the delay in the foreclosure process. Fourth quarter and first quarter results are also influenced by end of the year tax expense ramifications. Perhaps, this is a good sign that banks would rather smooth their expenses by waiting until 2011. This may indicate that the rest of 2011 will show signs of improvement.

It is interesting to see Chicago foreclosure filings increased minimally compared to other regions of Cook County. The reduction in the supply of vacant foreclosed homes and decreasing unemployment levels are also important indicators to watch.
April 27, 2011

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 
Discussion topics

access to banking services affordable housing asset limit reform bankruptcy building savings CDFIs CFPA consumer loan reform CRA credit cards credit scores credit unions data stories debt settlement EITC federal reg reform foreclosures from the president global Guest post HAMP analyses HMDA Illinois Community Investment Coalition loan modifications mortgage lending online community lending fact book overdraft loans photo policy press release RALs reading list Regional HOPI retirement security small business vacant properties video wealth building wh

Latest Comments
Homeowners receiving Illinois Hardest Hi...
I received a Loan Modification from my lender, probably due to filing with Illinois Hardest Hit. I am attempting to see how well others have faired. ...
Data underscore need for principal reduc...
1. Servicers, not investors, make the decisions to modify, foreclose, or not, with little regulation, oversite, or accountability. 2. Servicers get ...
Receive email updates






A member of:
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
29 E. Madison, Suite 1710 | Chicago, Illinois 60602-4566 | (312) 368-0310 tel | (312) 368-0316 fax
| Careers | Privacy | Site Map | Distribution/Linking Policy | Calendar of Events | Donate | Browse all documents |